<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>James Allen Willis &#187; Technology</title>
	<atom:link href="http://JamesWillis.net/category/christianity/technology/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://JamesWillis.net</link>
	<description>Website of blogger and writer James Allen Willis</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 05 Mar 2012 01:34:44 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>PC World Agrees with Me: Firefox is on the Way Out</title>
		<link>http://JamesWillis.net/pc-world-agrees-with-me-firefox-is-on-the-way-out/</link>
		<comments>http://JamesWillis.net/pc-world-agrees-with-me-firefox-is-on-the-way-out/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Aug 2010 12:05:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>James Allen Willis</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://JamesWillis.net/pc-world-agrees-with-me-firefox-is-on-the-way-out/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Once upon a time, not more than a year ago, Firefox was my favorite web browser. But then updates came along for Firefox that made it extremely slow on my old Windows XP machine. And I had troubles with some of the extensions (little helper programs that embed in the browser). Having no choice, because [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img style="border-right-width: 0px; margin: 0px 0px 10px 10px; display: inline; border-top-width: 0px; border-bottom-width: 0px; border-left-width: 0px" title="firefox-chrome" border="0" alt="firefox-chrome" align="right" src="http://jameswillis.net/wp-content/uploads/2010/08/firefoxchrome.jpg" width="200" height="120" /> Once upon a time, not more than a year ago, <a title="Firefox" href="http://www.mozilla.com/en-US/firefox/firefox.html">Firefox</a> was my favorite web browser. But then updates came along for Firefox that made it extremely slow on my old Windows XP machine. And I had troubles with some of the extensions (little helper programs that embed in the browser). Having no choice, because speed is such a critical issue, I changed to Google Chrome. And I haven’t looked back.</p>
<p>It seems I’m not the only one who came to the same conclusion about Firefox. From <em>PC World</em> via Yahoo! News:</p>
<blockquote><p>Firefox is also so notoriously slow that on older systems, it’s almost unusable or it takes so long to open that you find yourself clicking the icon multiple times, thinking that your original launch didn’t take for some reason.</p>
<p>Chrome, however, is usable and responsive. Now you understand why Firefox might not survive the browser wars. Its extension model is annoying to use, it’s slow on older systems, it’s slower than Chrome on any system, and its extensions break other extensions.*</p>
</blockquote>
<p>How about you? Which browser do you use? Tell me in the comments. If you care about speed, especially if you’re on a slower Internet connection, my advice is: Try <a title="Google Chrome" href="http://www.google.com/chrome/">Google Chrome</a>.</p>
<p>*<em>PC World</em>/Yahoo! News (Aug 2) &#8211; <a title="PC World - Firefox Falls Further Behind in Browser Wars" href="http://news.yahoo.com/s/pcworld/20100803/tc_pcworld/firefoxfallsfurtherbehindinbrowserwars">Firefox Falls Further Behind in Browser Wars</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://JamesWillis.net/pc-world-agrees-with-me-firefox-is-on-the-way-out/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Firefox 3.5 is a Dog on My Windows XP Machine</title>
		<link>http://JamesWillis.net/firefox-3-5-is-a-dog-on-my-windows-xp-machine/</link>
		<comments>http://JamesWillis.net/firefox-3-5-is-a-dog-on-my-windows-xp-machine/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Jul 2009 02:02:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>James Allen Willis</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://JamesWillis.net/?p=42</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Firefox is my web browsing software of choice, and has been going on four years now. I love it&#8217;s speed and it&#8217;s extensibility. I can add all sorts of functionality to it&#8211;little &#8220;add on&#8221; programs that make life easier for a web worker like me (FireFTP, Delicious bookmarking and SeoQuake are just some of the [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Firefox is my web browsing software of choice, and has been going on four years now. I love it&#8217;s speed and it&#8217;s extensibility. I can add all sorts of functionality to it&#8211;little &#8220;add on&#8221; programs that make life easier for a web worker like me (FireFTP, Delicious bookmarking and SeoQuake are just some of the ones I use).</p>
<p>Confession: My computer is long in the tooth&#8211;a Dell Dimension E310 (4+ years old) running Microsoft Windows XP, Media Center Edition, Version 2002 Service Pack 3. The chip is a Pentium 4, 2.80 GHz with 2 GB of RAM. But enough of the tech talk. My senior citizen computer ran the previous version of Firefox just fine.</p>
<p>I have now had two really lowsy experiences with Firefox upgrades. The first was more than a year ago when Firefox went from 2.x to 3.0. The new Firefox, for a long time, caused major problems on my system. Eventually they ironed out the bugs and it started working fine, but it took a good three months or more for things to return to normal. But they&#8217;ve just gone and done it again. This time the upgrade was from version 3.0 to version 3.5. And it is a DOG (speedwise). When I click to launch the browser, it takes at least a full 60 seconds before it opens. Then, when typing in the address bar, or clicking links to new sites, I experience major delays where the keystrokes stop and have to catch up. Not good.</p>
<p>I did a search and found this advice from one of my favorite blogs, Lifehacker: <a title="Lifehacker: Speed Up Firefox 3.5 Start-Up on Windows" href="http://lifehacker.com/5311669/speed-up-firefox-35-start+up-on-windows" target="_blank">Speed Up Firefox 3.5 Start-Up on Windows</a>. It seems Firefox, for security reasons, does a lot of random checking of files on your hard drive. I don&#8217;t profess to understand the technicalities involved&#8211;all I know is that whatever they&#8217;ve done to the newest version, it simply does not work for me. The delays I now experience with Firefox 3.5 have driven me to use Google Chrome 95% of the time. Yes, I really miss the add-on programs I used with Firefox, but day by day I&#8217;m learning shortcuts and workarounds to minimize my pain. Too bad for Firefox. They&#8217;ve now blown it twice, and if, as predicted, Chrome releases add-ons too, it&#8217;s bye bye to Firefox for me.</p>
<p>I sincerely hope Mozilla can turn it around before it&#8217;s too late.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://JamesWillis.net/firefox-3-5-is-a-dog-on-my-windows-xp-machine/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

